I'm in the market for a new digital camera, mainly because my current only is a clunky piece of crap that takes terrible photos and eats AAs like a starving bear. I think the reason I've been so lax about selling stuff online is that trying to take pictures of my items is a ghastly chore that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.
This is the piece I'm eyeing. At ~$480 it's just under my max budget, and if I buy it from Amazon I can cut down the price a bit with my Swagbucks earnings (I have about $30 in gift cards at the moment.)
It looks perfect, and not too pricey, but what I need to shoot the most is macro photos of small items such as hair clips, books, jewelry, things like that. My friend told me I'd probably want to get a macro lens for it, which would cost another $300+!
This was another piece I was looking at. It's a little cheaper, but I guess not as...advanced? I really don't know. I did look up some photos on flickr that were taken with it, and they looked quite good. Would it be on the same level as the Canon, should I never end up buying that extra macro lens? I don't know. T_T
From what I can glean from the reviews, the Olympus is like in-between a point and shoot and a DSLR, but the Canon is actually a DSLR. What the difference is, I have no clue. It would be nice if I could test them out first!
Borrow someone's DSLR body, rent macro from rentglass.com or the like.
ReplyDeleteLocal photog who macros flowers among other things
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry...did you mean for either of those comments to be helpful?
ReplyDelete